Department of Mathematics and Computer Science
MATH 160
Introduction to Applied Calculus
Sections 005 & 006 - D.
Cathcart Instructor
View
the course
syllabus.
View the "Instructor's
Policies."
View the "Guidelines for Written Work."
View the assignments
and tests for this course.
View the "Applied
Calculus Course Objectives."
View the links
for this course.
View the "Guidelines for Exercise Assignments."
View the "Guidelines for Interpreting Grades on Written Work."
Guidelines for Exercise Assignments
Each time you are asked to write up a solution for an assigned exercise, focus not only on solving the problem, but also on how you solve the problem. While you are working on the problem, keep notes on any difficulties you faced, false starts you made, and what led you to trying the approach you used. If you are able to solve the problem, clearly state your conclusion and explain why you think your approach works. If you feel you cannot solve the problem, describe in detail the process you used in attempting to find a solution. In either case, write a complete narrative telling the story of your attempt, successful or not, to solve the problem. Pretend that you are writing the narrative for another student who is confused by the problem and would like to know how you solved it. Each assignment you submit must be enclosed in a cover sheet employing a prescribed format. Information on"The Prescribed Format for Assignment Cover Sheets" can be found by following one of the following links.
The
Prescribed Format for Assignment Cover Sheets (Internet Explorer)
ThePrescribed
Format for Assignment Cover Sheets (Netscape)
Guidelines for Interpreting Grades on Written Work
5, Excellent. Your responses
to the assigned exercises/problems are correct and complete and you have
clearly and correctly communicated the processes and techniques used to
solve the exercises/problems. The paper is neat, attractive, and well-organized
and you have included appropriate graphs, tables, or diagrams, identified
all variables introduced, and clearly and appropriately stated and verified,
your conclusions.
4, Good. Your responses are reasonably correct and complete and your explanations of the processes and techniques used are fairly clear. However, some aspect may not be as complete, correct, clear, neat, or well organized as possible.
3, Satisfactory. Some of your responses may not be complete in some aspect, or have some errors, or lack clarity or supporting evidence. However, you do seem to understand most aspects of the assignment and posses most of the skills necessary to complete the assignment. Perhaps your work is not as neat and well organized as it should be.
2,
Needs Improvement. Your responses
are incomplete, unclear, lacking in style, or some major errors exist.
1,
Unsatisfactory.
You have not completed the assignment in a manner consistent with the guidelines.
However, it looks like you have tried to do some of the assigned exercises.
0, Unsatisfactory. The paperdoes not meet minimum acceptable standards for evaluation. Paper not evaluated.
Take a look at the assignments for this course.
Return to the top of this page.