Dr. Michael Lewis

 

History 607 – Seminar: Chesapeake and Middle Atlantic History

T/W/Th 6:00-8:30

FH 132

 

Office: 389 Holloway Hall

E-mail: mllewis@salisbury.edu

Phone: (410) 677-5020

Office Hours:  By appointment, any day of the week.

 

Course Texts:   
Boyd Gibbons, Wye Island

Davidson and Rountree, Eastern Shore Indians of Maryland and Virginia

Richard White, Organic Machine

Robert Grumet, Bay, Plain and Piedmont: A Landscape History of the Chesapeake Heartland from 1.3 Billion Years Ago to 2000 (internet version)

Edited Collection, Exploring the Chesapeake’s Forgotten River: Perspectives on the Wicomico (internet version)

Selected articles (available on the course website or given in class)

 

Course Description and Objectives:

I have two primary objectives in this course: to introduce you to the sub-field of environmental history – its concerns and methods – and to provide an overview of the specific environmental history of Delmarva and the Chesapeake region.  In both elements of the course, our readings will be representative rather than exhaustive, as you would expect of a three-week course.  This course should be viewed as a starting point for further research and study, rather than a comprehensive survey of a topic. Chronologically, we will range from prehistory to yesterday – my intent is to provide you with a sample of how an environmental history approach can relate to different periods and different topics in the study of regional history.  The enrollment for this course will be quite small – this will allow us to pursue your own questions and comments, but it will also put a strong burden on you to be an active participant in class discussions.  As environmental history is best studied not just in a classroom, we will be taking field trips every Wednesday evening.  A school van will be provided for these trips – please make sure that you show up on time so that we are able to complete the trip before the end of our allotted class time.  Please talk with me if you have any special interests or concerns not reflected in the class syllabus.

 

Grading Scale:            A            90-100%

                                    B            80-89%

                                    C            70-79%    

                                    D            60-69%                                        

                                    F            59% and below

 

Course Requirements:

Grading Breakdown:           
Participation:                                                 20%   

Four Reaction Papers (informal):                 40%

Final Assignment:                                          30%

Presentation:                                                  10%           

 

Participation: Participation in class is a precondition for success. I will expect you to come to class with all assigned readings completed, and notes on the readings as necessary for you to organize your thoughts.  Please read actively – jot down questions that you have about the readings, whether over things you don’t understand, or don’t agree with, or particularly like.  I recognize that the reading load is heavy, but this is a graduate level course, and we must squeeze a semester’s worth of activity into five weeks.  I suspect that you will be reading quite a bit during the week.  I have purposely scheduled field-trips for every Wednesday course, so that you will be able to have two days to prepare for Thursday’s assignments. These field trips are required portions of the class, and please treat them as such – bring appropriate note-taking tools, and active questions.

 

Reaction Papers: Each Tuesday, I will expect you to turn in an informal, typed, reaction to the previous week’s readings and discussions.  In these reactions, I would like for you to look for connections between the readings, for elements that you particularly liked, and things that you did not agree with.  What particularly struck you about the previous week’s material? Each reaction paper will serve as an intellectual sign-post for the class – how did the previous week’s material and discussions impact your understanding of history, broadly or locally conceived?  Two pages are sufficient, but you can go slightly longer if you wish.

 

Final Project:  No later than July 1st you will need to meet with me to talk about and decide upon your class project.  In a five week course it would be difficult to carry out a full research project and produce a seminar paper of 25 pages.  Instead, I will ask you to turn in a preliminary report of a proposed research project.  This report will consist of three primary parts: (1) a survey of the secondary literature, both regional and international, related to your topic (in paragraph form, complete with bibliography), (2) a discussion of the primary source base for your project,  (3) a research plan for how you would carry out this research project, if you had more time. This should include a potential thesis.  I expect that you will spend the most space describing part (1).  Please work with me on your project – I don’t want you to struggle on this by yourself, or risk turning something in that I did not want.

 

Presentation: On the final class meeting, July 24th, each of you will be asked to lead the class for between 20-25 minutes.  You will share with the class your research project.  This is not meant to be a strict lecture, however.  On the preceding Thursday, July 17th, you will pass out to your classmates copies of one article that you found particularly useful or provocative.  This article will be considered an assigned reading for the rest of the class. This final class meeting will allow each of you to both present material to your classmates, as well as lead a brief discussion of the common reading.

Writing Across the Curriculum:                  Writing across the Curriculum is a nationally recognized initiative that is designed to improve students’ learning through encouraging different types of writing in all university courses.  This course is committed to this program.

 

Class Schedule and Reading Assignments

 

June 24:           
Introduction to class; discussion of class goals, research tools and the class project.

 

June 25:            Field Trip (bring $4 for admission to Furnace Town)

 

June 26:           
-Mart Stewart, “Environmental History: Profile of a Developing Field,” History Teacher 31, no. 3 (May 1998): 351-368.

-Hal Rothman, “A Decade in the Saddle: Confessions of a Recalcitrant Editor,” Environmental History 7, no. 1 (January, 2002): 10-21.

-Adam Rome, “What Really Matters in History: Environmental Perspectives on Modern America,” Environmental History 7, no. 2 (April 2002): 303-318.

-Michael Lewis, “Seeing the World Whole: An Interview with William Cronon,” Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies 18 (1999): 1-10.

 

July 1:              
Reaction Due for Week One Material

Richard White, Organic Machine: 

 

July 2:               Field Trip

 

July 3:              
- John Smith, The Description of Virginia by Captaine Smith (1612)

- Andrew White, A Briefe Relation of the Voyage Unto Maryland (1633)

- Unknown, An Account of the Colony of the Lord Baron of Baltamore (1633)

- George Alsop A Character of the Province of Maryland (1666)

- Carville Earle, “Environment, Disease, and Mortality in early Virginia,” Journal of Historical Geography 5, no. 4 (1979): 365-390.

 

July 8:             
Reaction Due for Week Two Material

H. Rountree and T. Davidson, Eastern Shore Indians of Maryland and Virginia

 

July 9:               Field Trip

 

July 10:            
- Charles Fithian, “A Good and Fruitful Land: Colonists, Archaelogy and the Environment,” Outdoor Delaware (Fall 1994): 21-24.

 - J.L. Kirwan and H.H. Shugart, “Vegetation and two indices of fire on the Delmarva Peninsula,” Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 127, no. 1 (2000): 44-50.

- Henry Miller, “Transforming a ‘Splendid and Delightsome Land’: Colonists and Ecological Change in the Chesapeake 1607-1820,” Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 76, no. 3 (September 1986): 173-187.

 - Jack Wennersten, “Soil Miners Redux: The Chesapeake Environment, 1680-1810,” Maryland Historical Magazine 91, no. 2 (Summer 1996): 157-179.

- Allan Kulikoff, “Households and Markets: Toward a New Synthesis of American Agrarian History,” The William and Mary Quarterly 50, no. 2 (April 1993): 342-355.

 

July 15:           
 
Reaction Due for Week Three Material

Robert Grumet, Bay, Plain and Piedmont: A Landscape History of the Chesapeake Heartland from 1.3 Billion Years Ago to 2000 – available on the class website.

 

July 16: Field Trip

 

July 17:           This website is broken down into 13 chapters.  Become familiar with the organization of the material, but you are only required to read chapters 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, and 12. Unfortunately, all of the visual images (maps, photographs, etc) are not translating onto the website at the moment - so please excuse blank spaces and formatting problems. 
 
Exploring the Chesapeake’s Forgotten River: Perspectives on the Wicomico

                       

July 22:            
Reaction Due for Week Four Material

Boyd Gibbons, Wye Island

 

July 23: Field Trip

 

July 24: Student Research Presentations – readings as given on July 17

 

Final Project due in class, July 24

home