W r i t i n g L i k e
A S o c i o l o g i s t
How to write like a sociologist, which is a reflection of your
sociological imagination, is not something you are expected to know
at the beginning of the semester but rather to develop as the semester and your academic career progresses.
In general, as has been pointed out in other sections of these
Paper Guidelines, writing like a sociologist
reflects your respect for the intellectual enterprise -- most
specifically, respect for the intellectual enterprise of developing
a sociological imagination. Learning how to use your mind
effectively is just like learning how to use any other tool
effectively -- it takes time, concentration, energy, dedication, and
practice. That means you need to be persistent, focused, and
committed -- in short, you need to be engaged. Since I have a
working sociological imagination -- and I use it all the time --
what happens in the classroom, and how I participate in your online
discussions, the comments I make on your Sharing Assignments, and
Presentations -- including the design of this course -- all DISPLAY
a working sociological imagination. Therefore, if you are
engaged only part of the time you are 'participating' in those
things -- or you do those things with little persistence, focus, or
commitment, your grade -- both in the course and on your papers --
will reflect that.
The following information is some basic
advice about what to avoid and alternatives to get you started on
the right path. As indicated in the General Formatting section,
failure to adhere to the recommendations here will result in point
losses so attention detail and editing your own work are skills
you'll want to develop.
Sociological Style as a reflection of Sociological
Imagination
Focus your paper on social facts including social groups,
social structures, norms, patterns of behavior, social institutions,
and social organization. If you find yourself talking about individuals,
make sure you place them in a social context; use their age, race,
nationality, gender, and other relevant social characteristics (social class,
occupation, education, position, etc.) to do so. Using the example
from Cites -- 'some men tip their hats when greeting women'
-- the
behavior (greeting) is clarified through the identification of the
social characteristics of the people involved: men and women.
Social characteristics are often much more specific and indicated by factors such as age, ethnicity, occupation, or other more
behavior-based characteristics such as 'attractiveness', or
'flirtatiousness' and include stereotypes 'jock', 'valley girl',
'curmudgeon', etc. Where the behavior takes place, and when it
takes place are equally important components of social facts.
Additional components of social facts define and describe the social
context so time of day, and all kinds of information related to
social distance between the parties involved -- how well they know
each other, and factors that explain why they are in the same space
at the same time or the extent to which it is a shared experience,
define social context. Social facts are NOT general or abstract; they are
specific and detailed and clear. The above provides a pretty
good clarification of the level of detail you need to be dealing
with in your papers; the extent to which you are able to sustain
this level of detail in your papers reflects the quality of your
sociological imagination.
Additionally, a focus on social facts means that you are sticking with arguments that you can support with empirical evidence.
Reliable statistics or numbers, or other information from
sociological (or other reliable) sources including theoretical claims made by
sociologists or relevant experts, constitute evidence required to support your
argument. We will have discussed
'empirical' in class so you should know what it means. The basic
difference between empiricism and persuasive (and often morally or opinion driven
writing) is that the first relies upon evidence to build an
argument and the second relies upon emotional reaction to
value-laden and often hyperbolic claims. Empiricism means that
you are describing events, consequences, behaviors, outcomes, results, actual
observations without resorting to expressing your opinion or feelings.
Describe
your position in detail, with clarity about behaviors, social
patterns, etc. in terms that are both specific and
empirically verifiable. For example, 'some people believe'
leaves me wondering who, how many, and how you know that. 'Child
abuse is horrible' leads me to ask exactly why? 'Horrible', by the way, is both
value-laden and ambiguous; it cannot be empirically verified without
defining empirically what consequences constitute 'horrible' -- just
discuss the consequences. The use of value-laden and ambiguous
language reflects unsupported opinion-based writing/thinking and is
a poor substitute for empiricism; it reflects a poorly developed
sociological imagination because it uses individual opinion in the
place of clarity, detail, and precision. It reflects a lazy
mind, a willingness to take shortcuts, and a lack of
intellectualism.
Therefore, the advice is to avoid stating your opinion directly.
Sociologists do not have to rely upon hyperbole or value-based
arguments -- the facts are often shocking enough to generate
emotional reaction. Your opinion -- displayed through your use
of social facts and your sociological imagination -- will become clear if you
craft your argument using sociological language and rely upon empirical evidence.
Individualizing your argument is indicated by
the use of the generic 'you'; since sociology is the study of people
in groups, and NO sociological theory is directed at explaining
INDIVIDUAL behavior, the use of the generic 'you' in papers displays
a FUNDEMENTAL misunderstanding of the sociological enterprise.
Similarly, using your own personal experience as if ALL people would
understand, react, act, think, feel, behave, etc. THE SAME WAY YOU
DO also displays a FUNDEMENTAL misunderstanding of the sociological
enterprise -- this is called Personalizing your
argument. In more sociological terms, Personalizing,
as well as Individualizing, is ethnocentric, and
both display a flaw in logic similar to anthropomorphism.
Essentially it indicates an assumption that all individuals are the
same OR that social characteristics have no role in differences
among individuals -- both patently untrue as is obvious in daily
life.
Similarly, you should be relying upon sociological
theory in your explanations of social facts and, for 101 students,
in your explanations of your observations.
Your papers will, therefore, reflect your understanding of and
ability to apply (use correctly) relevant sociological terms.
Correct use of relevant sociological terms/language in ALL instances
indicates a working sociological imagination. By extension,
use of common language instead of relevant
sociological terms reflects a poorly developed sociological
imagination. As indicated on your Paper Checklist, the use of generic 'man',
'American' to refer to people in the US, anthropomorphizing,
moralizing, individualizing, and personalizing all
indicate a poorly developed sociological imagination as well.
See Common Problems for more details on these particular language
issues.
Argument Development
You are welcome to use 'I' in your papers,
after all, it is your work, but avoid explaining or using individual
behavior in the absence of appropriate social context. For example, if you find
yourself explaining things in terms of personality you will have to rethink the
sociological context and find sociological language to discuss it.
Similarly, avoid explaining individual behavior. Sociologists
deal with social behavior and behavior patterns associated with
people in different social groups or classifications; don't get hung
up on trying to explain why one person did something -- focus
instead on dealing with how that person's behavior might indicate
their particular social context including their social background,
socialization experiences, social class, race, gender, age, or other
social factors. Deal with individual behavior as examples that
illustrate or indicate the social characteristics of the individuals
exhibiting the behaviors and thereby demonstrate the social context
of the event or social facts you are trying to explain.
In general, it is a particular set of social facts, or a specific
social context, that you want to make the focus of your paper.
In fact, the more specific the 'topic' of your paper is, the better
you can develop your argument because it will limit the range of
details you need to address to make a strong argument. Make
clear what you are trying to explain and what the focus of your
paper is in your introductory paragraph. The sentence that
makes this clear is called your theme or your problem statement; it
should clearly identify the social facts you are trying to explain.
Often the most logical place for your theme or problem statement is
as the last sentence in your introductory paragraph.
The body of your paper should consist of multiple well-developed
paragraphs each of which deals with a single sociological concept or
idea. The paragraphs should logically follow from your
introduction and successively build your argument to answer the
implied question of your theme or problem statement. As
discussed above, empiricism is the key to building components of a
sociological argument. Sociological theory should offer you a
framework for the logical development of your paper. Use the logic
of sociological theory to order your paragraphs and step you -- and
your reader -- toward your conclusion. You want each paragraph
to provide the base for the following paragraph; the progression of
your argument through the development of theoretically connected
sociological ideas in the body of your paper should lead you/your
reader to a conclusion that provides a clear answer to the implied
question of your theme or problem statement.
Your concluding paragraph is your opportunity to engage in a bit
of creativity (see Bloom's Taxonomy for clarification); this is the
ultimate expression of a well-developed working sociological
imagination. You conclusion consists of a brief summary of
your argument; it literally pulls the threads of your argument
together in a nice, neat package stating, in one or two sentences, a
clear answer to the implied question of your theme or problem
statement. Your opportunity for creativity is in discussing
the implications of your conclusion -- keep it simple, keep it
clear, keep it concise.
Throughout your paper, you need to use your sources to build your
argument. Generally this means the use of limited quotes but
abundant cites indicating that you have gained a deep understanding
of the issues. Good use of sources is reflected in multiple
cites from multiple sources in each paragraph; paraphrasing (as
opposed to quoting) indicates that you understand the material you
are dealing with. Using multiple sources in a single paragraph
indicates that you have analyzed the information in your sources and
can use it to evaluate your own knowledge. Use of multiple
cites from multiple sources in each paragraph demonstrates both
empiricism and your success in integrating or synthesizing
information from your sources to form a coherent explanation for the
social facts you are focused on. For 101 students, a similar
use of your observation is expected.
There are exemplars of previous student work that demonstrate the
qualities of good papers posted on my website. Feel free to
use these to get an idea of what a good sociology paper might look
like. Bear in mind, however, that trying to 'mimic' someone
else's work is not a substitute for developing a deep understanding
of a particular set of social facts. Papers, and writing in
general, reflect thinking -- a well-written, logically, empirically,
and theoretically developed paper therefore reflects a working, and
developing, sociological imagination. Your goal is to
demonstrate the quality of your sociological imagination by
revealing the depth of your knowledge and understanding of a
particular set of social facts that interest you. And choosing
social facts that interest you are key to writing good papers
because your interest is what will determine the time you invest in
the intellectual endeavor it takes to develop your mind and
sociological imagination to the point that you can produce a good
paper.
|