SCED 376 / 476 and EMAT 531 / 533 Name_______________
Professional Development Paper Date____________
|
|
TARGET |
ACCEPTABLE |
UNACCEPTABLE |
COMMENTS |
|
Critical attributes |
Information about time, date, place of the professional development activity is included (3 pts) |
Two out of the three required elements are in cluded (2 pts) |
One or no elements included (1-0 pt) |
|
|
Overview of activity |
Activity is described very well and includes pertinent and interesting details (4-5 pts) |
Activity is adequately described and includes some details (3-2 pts) |
It is difficult to determine what the activity is (1-0 pt) |
|
|
Why activity was selected |
Reasons for attending the activity are clearly described and show links to the concept of professional development (9-10 pts) |
Reasons for attending the activity are adequately described (6-8 pts) |
Little or no reason for participation in the activity is provided (5-0 pts) |
|
|
Reflection regarding how the activity contributed to development as a future teacher |
Thoughtful commentary and evidence provided showing how this activity contributed to the development of this individual as a future teacher (9-10 pts) |
Some discussion and minimal evidence provided showing how this activity contributed to the development of this individual as a future teacher (6-8 pts) |
Little or no discussion or evidence provided showing how this activity contributed to the development of this individual as a future teacher (5-0 pts) |
|
|
Organization, clarity of style, accuracy of grammar and spelling, length of paper |
Paper is well organized, easily understood, with few or no grammar and / or spelling errors; 2 or more pages (2 pts) |
Paper is fairly well organized, fairly easily understood, with some grammar and / or spelling errors; 1 – 1 ½ pages (1 pt) |
Paper is not well organized, is difficult to understand, with many grammar and / or spelling errors; less than 1 page (0 pt) |
|
/30