Portfolio Assessment of Artifacts Name____________

Artifact # _____ / Standard # _____ Date____________

	TARGET	ACCEPTABLE	UNNACCEPTABLE	COMMENTS
WHAT?	The artifact is well described and appropriate (3 pts)	The artifact is somewhat well described and somewhat appropriate (2 pts)	The artifact is not well described or described at all or is inappropriate for the standard selected (1-0 pt)
SO WHAT?	The relationship of the artifact to the standard identified is clear and well written, reinforcing the appropriate selection of this artifact for this standard (4-3 pts)	The relationship of the artifact to the standard identified is somewhat clear and written fairly well and, to a degree, reinforces the appropriate selection of this artifact for this standard (2 pts)	The relationship of the artifact to the standard identified is not clear and is not written well; it does not reinforce the appropriate selection of this artifact for this standard (1-0 pt)
NOW WHAT?	The thoughtful reflection of what to do now in relation to the standard and the artifact is well organized and well written (3 pts)	The reflection of what to do now in relation to the standard and the artifact is somewhat well organized and somewhat well written; there is some evidence of reflective thought (2 pts)	The reflection of what to do now in relation to the standard and the artifact is not well organized and not well written; there is little or no evidence of reflective (1-0 pt)

/ 10