BETWEEN THE BIBLE AND A BOOK
Philosophy 450: Philosophy of Literature
Dr. James Hatley
Phone: 677-5072 (O); 543-7635 (H)
Office: Philosophy House, 103
Office Hours: TO BE ANNOUNCED IN CLASS. Please make an appointment with
me if you are unable to use the scheduled office hours.
Why do good people suffer? Why
do the evil prosper? Why must the world
be as it is? These questions lead many
thinkers to the notion of theodicy, a justification of G-d’s
ways—or the ways of the universe—in the face of human consternation with or
affliction by Her/Him/it. Can we and should we justify the world as it
is? To answer this question, we will
begin by looking at how three different philosophers respond to Biblical Texts—
in the case of Martin Buber, to The Book of Psalms, and in the case of Philip Nemo and Henry Bugbee, to The Book of Job—in order to
reflect on the question or even desirability of theodicy. After this, we will
turn to a series of literary texts—from drama to poetry to novels, in order to
continue our conversation on this difficult yet compelling subject. In doing so, we will find the theme to be a
complex one with many historical, cultural and religious implications. And we will hone our hermeneutical skills in
interpreting a variety of literary genres from a series of religious and
cultural traditions.
Since this is an enriched course being offered for four credits,
students are required to engage in two extra-classroom projects. In the first students will break up into
groups in order to put on a scene from one of the plays we will be reading in
class. In the second, students will read
an additional book on their own and then write a response to it in light of
what they have learned in class over the semester. This second project will require the student
to keep a reading journal of at least a page a week for the entirety of the
course.
REQUIRED TEXTS
AA Tony
Kushner: Angels in
JEE Phillippe Nemo: Job and the
Excess of Evil (with additional
essays by Emmanuel Levinas and Michael Kigel)
KL William
Shakespeare: King Lear
PaPl Sarah Ruhl: Passion Play, a Cycle Play
PC Paul Celan: 3 Poems
PuPa Cynthia
Ozik: The Puttermesser Papers
Required Background
JPS—Hebrew/English Tanach (with
Hebrew text aside English)
Additional Required Text for
Individual Project—Choose One Sophocles Oedipus the King, Oedipus
at Colonus, Antigone Marge Piercy He,
She, It Nathaniel Hawthhorne The Scarlet Letter Samuel Beckett Endgame and Waiting for Godot Herman Melville Moby Dick Isaac Bashevis
Singer Satan at Goray,
or Enemies: A Love Story Eli Wiesel Night David Grossman See Under: Love Jane Hamilton A Map of the World Wendell Berry Sabbath Poems Jerzy Kozinsky The Painted Bird Stephen Mitchell A Book of Psalms, Adapted from the Hebrew Jane Smiley A Thousand Acres Leslie Marmon Silko Ceremony Louise Erdrich Love Medicine, or Four Souls, or Tracks Fydor Dosteyevsky The Brothers Karamazov David James Duncan The Brothers K Albert Camus The Plague Toni Morrison Beloved Khaled Hosseini The
Kite runner Orhan Pamuk Snow Chaim Potok My Name is Asher Lev
GRADING Weekly Questions (10) 20% Response Papers (3) 36% Oral/Dramatic Interpretation of Play 10% Class
Presentations (3) 09% Individual
Response Paper 10% Reading Journal 10% Participation 05%
ASSIGNMENTS
Weekly Reading Questions will be turned in by the student ten times during the semester. This assignment requires that you respond in a short essay a typewritten page in length to a question given the week before about a reading we will be discussing that day in class. Your short essay must be turned in at the beginning of the class in which the reading is to be discussed. You should bring two copies of this assignment to class--one to turn in and the other to help with your notes and to share with the class, if called upon. If you turn in reading questions after the day they are due, the best grade you can receive is a C.
Response Papers: Response
papers are the principal manner in which your grade will be determined. They will be assigned roughly every four
weeks and require that you write a four page essay in which you will
respond thoughtfully to a question pertaining to what we have been reading and
discussing in class. A response paper should make use of citations from the
text(s) appropriate to the question to be answered. In a response paper you are to give reasons
for any position you take. The question "Why?" should always be in
the back of your mind as you write.
Individual Response Paper: You will write an additional response paper on a literary work you have undertaken to read outside of class. It will be due during finals week at the end of the semester.
Oral/Dramatic Interpretation of Play: You will work with a group of your fellow students to put on a scene from one of the plays we will be reading in class this semester. You will be required to put on the scene outside of class in a public space (in the lounge at the student center, in the red square, at a philosophy society meeting, etc.) sometime during the course of the semester.
Class Presentation: Three times during the semester each student will lead a discussion of the questions assigned for that week in class. This will occur on Tuesday, the first day the class meets every week. The student serving as the discussion leader will have written out her or his answers to the questions for that week beforehand and will be prepared to share those answers in order to invite other student’s to participate in the discussion. The student should also come up with two additional questions that students and professor should consider. We will begin our discussion with these questions by the student.
HONOR CODE: Each written assignment should be accompanied by the following statement, dated and signed by the student: “This assignment was completed honorably by me and is my own work.”
Weekly Themes,
WEEK ONE (): Writing in the Shadow of the Bible
Reading Questions: (due Thursday,):
WEEK TWO (): The Drama in the Book of Psalms of the Good Soul confronting Evil in the World
Reading Questions:
WEEK THREE (): The Suffering of the Individual Human—A Philosophical Approach to the Book of Job
WEEK FOUR (): The Sting of Evil
Assignment:
First Response Paper Due: Compare and Contrast Paul Celan’s
poem “Psalm” to Psalm 73, as analyzed by Martin Buber. In each case the text has to do with the
struggle of a soul to make sense of a world fraught with cruelty and arrogance,
in which evil-doers are even given leave to eat the good, “as if they were
bread.” Which Psalm do you think more
truthfully sets out the case for the soul’s struggle with evil? Support your conclusion. Feel free to make reference to Celan’s poem “Death Fugue,” as well as to other psalms
discussed by Buber, in making your case.
3 plus pages.
WEEK FIVE (): An Answer (sort of) to Evil
Reading Questions: 1) What does Nemo mean by “faith” and how is it the “fruit of the excess of evil”?; 2) What is the structure of revelation in Job, according to Nemo? What does Nemo mean, do you think, by “revelation”?; 3) Do you agree or disagree with Nemo’s depiction of G-d? Why or why not?
WEEK SIX (): A Taoist Inflection to the Book of Job
Assignment: Second Response Paper Due
WEEK SEVEN (): A Retelling of Job in a Pagan Key
Reading Questions: 1)
How does the fool seek to instruct Lear?
Is this instruction helpful? How
is it similar to or different from the instruction Job receives from the four comforters?;
2) What grave error, in your estimation, does Lear make that leads to his
affliction? Can he be said to deserve
what he suffers? Why or why not?; 3) Would you want Lear to come visit you, if her
were your father? Why or why not? What obligations do we owe a parent and why?;
4) Rather than being betrayed by G-d (actually the g-ds, since Lear is a pagan king), Lear seems more betrayed
by his own family? Is that betrayal
worse? Why or why not?
Assignment: First Six Pages of Reading Journal Due
A Good Article on Typological Readings in the Christian Tradition
WEEK EIGHT (): A Retelling of Job in a Pagan Key
Reading Questions: 1) Both Gloucester and Lear have moments of Jobian affliction and Jobian illumination. Briefly, compare and contrast the experience of these two figures in regard to their affliction and illumination; 2) In what way does Lear’s final illumination concerning his affliction either further or abandon the illumination of Job at the end of the Book of Job?; 3) In what way does Tom O’Bedlam instruct Lear about affliction? In what way is her similar to and in what way is her different from the four comforters of Job?
WEEK TEN (10/29, 31): A Retelling of Christ’s Passion as a Retelling of a Retelling of Job in a Contemporary, Genocidal Key
Reading Questions: 1) What is the significance of the cycle of passion plays that is the subject of this play? What comes of the playwright locating the play in three different historical eras? 2) Pick either 2a or 2b. 2a: The Passion Play traditionally is about the suffering of Christ on the cross to save humankind from its universal perversion through sinfulness. In this manner, the Christian Passion, according to Christians, more deeply resolves the issues of suffering raised in Job. Do you think the Christ(s) in this play is/are in keeping with this understanding? Why or why not? In answering, consider whether there might be a difference between the role of Christ and the man playing this role. OR 2b: The role of Violet is not one normally considered part of the traditional Passion Play. She exists on the margins of the plays we read about here. How does her presence affect the meaning of the passion plays being performed in this cycle?; 3) Do you think this is mainly a Christian play, a Jewish play, a Biblical play? Or something more than any of these?
A Passion
Play: Arena Stage Production
WEEK ELEVEN (11/5, 7): A Retelling of the Golem as a Retelling of a Retelling of Job in a Contemporary, Civic Key
EXPERT QUESTONS: Echeverria, Floriana; Garner, Robert Scott; Hauck, Matthew Brian
Reading Questions: 1) Why does Puttermesser construct the Golem? In what way does this motivation relate to the Book of Job?; 2) What characters in the Puttermesser Papers (so far) resemble those in Psalm 12 who speak with a double heart?; 3) Is Puttermesser wiser or in despair or both by the end of the Golem episode? Why or why not?
Assignment: First 10 Pages of Reading Journal Due
WEEK TWELVE (11/12, 14): NO CLASSES! MEET AND WORK IN PERFORMANCE GROUPS.
WEEK THIRTEEN (11/19): Continued discussion of Part I of Puttermesser Papers:
First Set of Expert Questions will be discussed in class: Echeverria, Floriana; Garner, Robert Scott; Hauck, Matthew Brian
Reading Questions: 1)
Discuss the relationship of Xanthippe the Golem to Puttermeser--how does each side of this relationship
illuminate the character of the other entity?; 2) What are the strengths and weaknesses of the
philosophical life according to the Golem section of the Puttermesser
Papers? Do you agree with this
assessment?
Assignment:
Second Response Paper Due: Compare and contrast the personage of Job
in The Book of Job with the characters of
WEEK FOURTEEN (11/26, 28): A Retelling of the Golem as a Retelling of a Retelling of Job in a Contemporary, Civic Key
Expert Questions: Jackson, Calvin; John, Zachary Candler; Kunkel, Joseph Richard; Lewandowski, Marcin Marek , Miller, Ryan Scott; Myers, Jessica Leigh; Newell, Hilary Gooden; Rivera-Pratts, Jessica Marie; Ruoff, Alexander James, Schaffer, Amber Lauren; Wayne, Alison Paige
Reading Questions: 1) What might be argued are the strengths and weaknesses of the artistic perspective on a life, in light of the third section of the Puttermesser Papers?; 2) Compare and contrast Puttermesser's vision of Gan Edyn in the first paper and the revelation of Pardes (Paradise) in the final section of The Puttermesser Papers.; 3) How might Buber's thoughts on Psalm 73 find some significance in the final events of Puttermesser's life?
WEEK FIFTEEN (12/2, 4): Performances and Discussion. Return to A Passion Play for a more detailed discussion.
Play Performances: Wednesday in Class
FINALS WEEK
Assignment: 15 Pages of Reading Journal Due
Assignment:
Third Response Paper Due Starting with the book you have been reading
this semester, discuss how it might be interpreted as a response to the questions
raised in the Book of Job and in the Psalms about the significance of
suffering, repentance, conversion and redemption. Keeping Nemo’s
analysis of Job in mind, in what manner does suffering become an excess, an
evil in your book? What are the
different strategies adopted by differing characters to responding to this
evil? Does a particular response of a
central character in your book renew or redeem her or his life? In what way do you find the infinite being
given or refused a voice in the book’s language and story? In what
manner does the book either present a theodicy or engage in a critique of
it? Finally, reflect, given your
experience this semester, on the difference between reading a book as
literature and as (religious) revelation.
Does your book ask for both manners of reading? Do you feel comfortable in engaging in both
manners of reading? Why or why not?
This paper should be at least 5 pages long. It MUST
be sent to me VIA EMAIL in WORD FORMAT (.doc) by NOON, FRIDAY, DECEMBER 14th. Since I will be out of town on that date, I
will NOT be able to pick up any hard copies of your paper in my mail box.