PLEASE NOTE: THE FINAL EXAM FOR DR. LEWIS' HISTORY 102 WILL BE IN THE WICOMICO ROOM
Review Sheet for Third Exam
History 102
I. Identifications
Kennan
Telegram
Truman Doctrine
Archduke Ferdinand
Treaty
of Versailles
Hitler
Fascism
Mein
Kampf
Lebensraum
Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere
Mussolini Auschwitz Winston Churchill
Realpolitik
Franklin D. Roosevelt
Joseph Stalin
Containment
Marshall Plan
McCarthyism
Military-Industrial Complex Anti-colonialism Superman
Iron Curtain Politics of Morality Mahatma Gandhi
Indian Partition (look in your book) Vladimir Lenin Sputnik
Sun
Yat-Sen
Bolsheviks
Jawaharlal Nehru
Mao
Zedong
Indian National Congress
Lenin’s plan for 3rd World Revolutions
Kerala Ho Ch Minh Arbenz and Guatamala
Banana Republics Bay of Pigs Good Neighbor policy
Zapata Salvador Allende United Fruit Company
Prince ibn Saud Sadamm Hussein "Dulce et Decorum Est"
Bandung Conference Non-Aligned Movement Hungary uprising 1956
Korean War NATO United Nations
Bangladesh Patrice Lumumba 14 points
Democratic Recession Sharif Husayn Wahhabism
al Qaeda Axis of Evil Osama bin Laden
Greater Syria Cuban Missile Crisis Prague Spring 1968
1)Could you make the argument that the
destruction and death of the twentieth century had its roots in European global
imperialism and expansion since 1450? How
do you link these different events and times? What do you see in WWI, WW II or
the Cold War which echoes earlier themes in this class?
(consider why and how Japan and Germany go to war in WW II, and the
European causes of and responses to WW I.)
2.) Imagine
a debate between two people. One is
a US citizen, the other is from a developing, post-colonial nation. The US
citizen is trying to defend western (US and European) actions in the twentieth
century as supporters of democracy and liberty; the other is attacking the West
as a force for oppression during the twentieth century. Describe this
debate. How would each person attempt to prove their points? What
historical examples would they use? On what historical interpretations would
they differ? Who, in your opinion, would win the debate?
3.) How
did the Cold War and Anti-Colonialism/Nationalism in the Third World intersect
in the second half of the twentieth century?
What were some of the consequences of these two simultaneous world
trends? How did it matter to the
U.S., to the USSR, and to the Third World? Use specific examples in proving your
points.
5.) On the first day of class, we discussed the ten largest nation-states in the world, by area and population. We discussed which societies were generally ignored or unknown to the class, and which societies were "over-estimated" in area and population, if not in importance. We then looked at the twenty wealthiest societies in the world, per capita - the European and Euro-based societies dominated that list. I suggested to you that the story of this course would be the story of how we might understand those lists - how a people both numerically and area-wise that are but a small part of the world came to dominate the world's resources and wealth. So, imagine that over the summer your parent(s) ask you - "So, now that you've taken World Civ II, why is the world divided (in wealth, power, and population) in the way that it is? Why are Asia, Africa, and Latin America so poor and populous, though rich in natural resources, while Europe is rich but with a smaller population and less resources? And how is it that the US managed to be the only country on all three lists - both rich in resources, as well as rich and populous? What are the implications of these divisions for world politics during your lifetime?" Give me your answer. Remember, you parent(s) are paying your tuition, so make the answer good!
6.) Consider 9/11. How many links to this course's themes can you make from the historical trends that led to this event and the global reaction in the six years since then?